Purchase This Domain

This domain is a Michael A. Wills domain holdings property and is available for purchase. Contact us or submit your confidential offer to domains at willslaw.ca for consideration and response. Discover more domain properties for sale on our domains for sale listing page.

Quick-check the ahrefs domain rating and link profile: click here.

Minimum offer: $140.00 (USD)

Active Sites Not for Sale

Terminated.Law

Employment lawyer for: wrongful dismissal lawyer

Weclose.Law

Residential real estate lawyer for: residential refinancing

Employer.Law

Management-side employment lawyer for: wrongful dismissal

More Top Domains for Sale

Latest Posts from Terminated.Law

  • Robinson v Heinz Company: A Claim of Constructive Dismissal
    by Michael Wills on December 16, 2024

    Constructive Dismissal in Leamington: A Closer Look BackgroundThis case stems from H.J. Heinz Company of Canada LP’s decision to close its Leamington, Ontario plant in 2014. Karen Robinson, a long-serving employee with nearly 40 years of tenure, was affected by the plant closure. Although Heinz […]

  • Hilton v K & S Services: A Matter of Jurisdiction
    by Michael Wills on December 14, 2024

    Tecumseh Resident Secures Jurisdiction in Ontario for Constructive Dismissal Claim In Hilton v. K & S Services Inc., the Ontario Court of Appeal affirmed that Ontario courts have jurisdiction over a constructive dismissal claim brought by Craig Hilton, a Tecumseh, Ontario resident, against his […]

  • Ontario Employment Standards Act Key Protections: Your Rights Explained
    by Michael Wills on December 13, 2024

    Introduction The Employment Standards Act, 2000 (ESA) is the cornerstone of workplace rights in Ontario. This legislation outlines the minimum standards employers must meet to ensure fair treatment of employees. Understanding your rights under the ESA empowers you to identify violations and take […]

Latest Posts from Weclose.Law

  • Understanding the Statement of Adjustments
    by Michael Wills on October 31, 2024

    Get clarity on understanding the statement of adjustments in Ontario real estate. Weclose ensures accuracy in closing costs, from taxes to utilities and fees. The post Understanding the Statement of Adjustments first appeared on Weclose.

  • Ontario Land Transfer Tax and Closing Costs
    by Michael Wills on October 31, 2024

    Learn about Ontario land transfer tax and closing costs. Weclose helps buyers understand LTT, rebates, and expenses for a transparent home-buying experience. The post Ontario Land Transfer Tax and Closing Costs first appeared on Weclose.

  • Calculating Land Transfer Tax in Ontario
    by Michael Wills on October 31, 2024

    Calculating Land Transfer Tax in Ontario: Learn about tax rates, first-time buyer rebates, and closing costs today. Discover exemptions and rebates. The post Calculating Land Transfer Tax in Ontario first appeared on Weclose.

Recent Decisions from Ontario Court of Appeal

  • R. v. Cyrus, 2025 ONCA 296 (CanLII)
    on April 16, 2025

    Criminal procedure — Appeals — Bifurcation of conviction and sentence appeals — Appellant sought to separate conviction and sentence appeals, citing efficiency and interests of justice — Should the conviction and sentence appeals be bifurcated? — Appeals should only be bifurcated where compelling reasons exist — R. v. M.W., 2015 ONCA 644 appliedCivil procedure — Case management — Procedural history — Appellant’s procedural delays and changes in representation contributed to inefficiency — Are there compelling reasons to justify bifurcation of conviction and sentence appeals? — Procedural inefficiency and overlap in issues weigh against bifurcationStatutory interpretation — Dangerous offender designation — Indeterminate sentence — Whether the dangerous offender designation requires the panel hearing the sentence appeal to review the trial record — Predicate offences relevant to dangerous offender designation — R. v. D.L., 2024 ONCA 908 appliedEvidence — Overlap in trial record — Dangerous offender designation and conviction appeal — Does the sentence appeal require review of the trial record? — Overlap in issues between conviction and sentence appeals necessitates joint hearing to avoid duplication

  • A.A. v. Z.S.M., 2025 ONCA 283 (CanLII)
    on April 16, 2025

    Family — Return orders — Jurisdiction — Serious harm — Allegations of domestic violence — Child’s best interests — Did the motion judge err in failing to consider the full scope of serious harm under s. 23(b) of the Children’s Law Reform Act, including domestic violence, separation from the primary caregiver, and refugee applications? — Framework for assessing serious harm and jurisdiction under ss. 23 and 40 of the CLRAChild protection — Serious harm — Domestic violence — Primary caregiver — Refugee applications — Whether the motion judge erred in failing to assess the risk of serious harm to the child, including exposure to domestic violence, separation from the mother, and the extinguishment of refugee claims — Best interests of the child as paramount consideration under the Children’s Law Reform ActCitizenship and immigration — Refugee applications — Non-refoulement — Interaction between refugee law and family law — Does the existence of a pending refugee application automatically stay proceedings under the Children’s Law Reform Act or preclude a return order? — Rebuttable presumption of serious harm upon refugee status determination — Balancing provincial family law and federal refugee law obligationsCivil procedure — Procedural fairness — Adjournments — Evidence — Whether the motion judge denied the appellant procedural fairness by refusing an adjournment, limiting evidence to oral testimony, and failing to allow cross-examination of the respondent — Procedural fairness in family law proceedings involving self-represented litigants

  • R. v. Shaporov, 2025 ONCA 281 (CanLII)
    on April 15, 2025

    Constitution — Charter of Rights — Section 11(b) — Unreasonable delay — Complexity of case — COVID-19 pandemic — Exceptional circumstances — Did the trial judge err in attributing periods of delay to the defense and finding the case complex enough to justify delay beyond the Jordan ceiling? — Framework for assessing delay under R. v. Jordan and R. v. CodyCriminal procedure — Delay — Section 11(b) — Defense delay — Exceptional circumstances — COVID-19 pandemic — Did the trial judge err in calculating net delay and attributing certain periods to the defense? — Application of the Jordan framework to periods of delay caused by defense unavailability and systemic issuesEvidence — Search warrants — Section 8 — Information to Obtain (ITO) — Reasonable grounds — Full, frank, and fair disclosure — Did the trial judge err in finding the ITO sufficient and the affiant credible? — Test for sufficiency of ITOs and affiant candor under R. v. Garofoli and R. v. MorelliEvidence — Burden of proof — Third-party suspect — Misapprehension of evidence — Passwords — TOR browser — Did the trial judge err by reversing the burden of proof and misapprehending evidence about the appellant’s password and the TOR browser? — Standard for assessing third-party suspect defenses under R. v. VillaromanCitizenship and immigration — Sentencing — Conditional sentence — Exceptional circumstances — Immigration consequences — Did the trial judge err in denying a conditional sentence by requiring exceptional circumstances and assigning limited weight to immigration status? — Principles governing conditional sentences under R. v. M.M. and R. v. Pike